mouse anti-human e2f2 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)
Structured Review

Mouse Anti Human E2f2 Antibody, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti-human e2f2 antibody/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "C/EBPβ Coupled with E2F2 Promoted the Proliferation of hESC-Derived Hepatocytes through Direct Binding to the Promoter Regions of Cell-Cycle-Related Genes"
Article Title: C/EBPβ Coupled with E2F2 Promoted the Proliferation of hESC-Derived Hepatocytes through Direct Binding to the Promoter Regions of Cell-Cycle-Related Genes
Journal: Cells
doi: 10.3390/cells12030497
Figure Legend Snippet: The overexpression of C/EBPβ promoted the proliferation of HPCs. ( A ) The diagram shows that cells were disassociated by TrypLE at HPC D7 and then seeded at 4 × 10 4 cells/cm 2 on collagen type I coated plates. Simultaneously, PLV-C/EBPβ virus was administrated. Subsequently, cells were disassociated again and counted at HPC D8 and HPC D14, respectively. ( B ) Cell numbers were determined by cell counts for HPC on day 8 and for HPC on day 14. ( C ) GSEA results showed that cell cycle and E2F targets related genes were significantly enriched in HPCs transduced with PLV-C/EBPβ on day 14 when compared with those transduced with PLV-Vector on day 14. ( D ) Heat maps of selected proliferative genes and suppressor genes were differentially expressed between HPCs transduced with PLV-Vector or with PLV- C/EBPβ on day 14. ( E ) The KEGG pathways for the differentially expressed genes between HPCs transduced with PLV-Vector or with PLV- C/EBPβ on day 14. The principal pathways were the cell cycle and DNA replication. ( F ) Volcano plots showed significant changes in cell-cycle-related genes between HPCs transduced with PLV-Vector or with PLV- C/EBPβ on day 14. Volcano plot showed −log10 ( p -value) on the y-axis versus log2 (fold change) on the x-axis. Each point represented a different gene. ( G , H ) Relative expression of proliferative genes, including PCNA, CDC25C, CDC45L, MCM3, GINS1, and CCND1 ( F ) and E2F genes, including E2F1 and E2F2 ( H ) in HPCs transduced with PLV-Vector or with PLV- C/EBPβ on day 14. Data represent mean ± SEM with p -values indicated when significant. p < 0.05 *, p < 0.01 **, p < 0.001 ***, ns, not significant. Data are the three samples per group.
Techniques Used: Over Expression, Transduction, Plasmid Preparation, Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: C/EBPβ Knockdown impaired hepatic differentiation and blocked proliferation of HPCs. ( A ) Representative images of cell morphologies of HPCs 2 days after si-RNA treatments on day 12 and cell numbers were counted in each group in ( A ). ( B ) Schematic illustration of si-RNA mediated C/EBPβ knockdown during the hepatic differentiation of hESCs. ( C ) Knockdown efficiency of C/EBPβ was detected by qRT-PCR on day 14 of HPCs. ( D ) ALB secretion was detected from the supernatants of cultured HPCs 24 h after siRNA (C/EBPβ) treatment. ( E ) Relative gene expression analysis of hepatocyte genes including AFP, ALB, ASGPR1, A1AT, HNF4A, and CEBPα in HPCs treated with si-NC or with si-C/EBPβ on day 14. ( F ) Heat map of selected genes, including hepatocyte genes, proliferative genes, and suppressor genes in HPCs treated with si-NC or with si-C/EBPβ on day 14. ( G ) The same number of LO2 cells were seeded, and then si-RNA mediated C/EBPβ knockdown was conducted. After 3 days of treatments, DAPI staining was performed to mark the nuclei, and then cell numbers were defined by ImageJ software. ( H ) Relative expression of proliferative genes including CDC25C, CDC45L, GINS1, MCM3, E2F1, and E2F2 in HPCs treated with si-NC or with si-C/EBPβ on day 14. ( I ) GSEA results showed that cell-cycle-related gene sets, such as MYC targets, cell-cycle literature, and mitosis targets bound by E2F, were significantly enriched in HPCs treated with si-NC when compared with those in HPCs treated with si-C/EBPβ. Data represent mean ± SEM with p -values indicated when significant. p < 0.05 *, p < 0.01 **, p < 0.0001 ****, ns, not significant. Data are the three samples per group.
Techniques Used: Quantitative RT-PCR, Cell Culture, Expressing, Staining, Software
Figure Legend Snippet: C/EBPβ coupled with E2F2 orchestrated cell proliferation of HPCs. ( A , B ) Western blot analysis of C/EBPβ on day 14 of HPCs after the knockdown or overexpression of C/EBPβ ( A ), and the statistical results ( B ). ( C , D ) Western blot analysis of representative protein expressions associated with cell proliferation after knockdown of C/EBPβ (C) , and corresponding statistical results ( D ). ( E , F ) Western blot analysis of representative protein expressions associated with cell proliferation after overexpression of C/EBPβ ( E ) and corresponding statistical results ( F ). ( G , H ) Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assays to validate interaction of C/EBPβ with E2F2 in HPCs on day 14 and LO2 cells. The cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation with C/EBPβ antibody, and the resulting immunoprecipitants were analyzed in the immunoblot with E2F2 and C/EBPβ antibodies (IB: E2F2; IB: C/EBPβ). Input was also subjected to immunoblot to represent a positive control, and non-specific IgG represented as a negative control. Data represent mean ± SEM with p -values indicated when significant. p < 0.05 *, p < 0.01 **, ns, not significant. Data are the three samples per group.
Techniques Used: Western Blot, Over Expression, Immunoprecipitation, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Positive Control, Negative Control
Figure Legend Snippet: C/EBPβ promoted the expression of proliferative genes by binding to promoter regions. ( A ) CUT&Tag data analysis for peak summit of relative genes at location map, the abscissa was the distance between peak summit and TSS site, and the ordinate was the number of peaks. ( B ) Pie chart of peak distribution on gene functional elements. ( C ) Top scoring and representative motif sequence of C/EBPβ binding sites. ( D ) KEGG enrichment bubble diagram to show the first 20 pathways with the smallest q values, pathway shown as the ordinate and rich factor shown as the abscissa (the number of differences in this pathway divided by all the numbers). The size indicated the number; the redder the color, the smaller the q value. ( E – I ) The peaks of individual proliferative genes, including CDC25C, CDC45L, PCNA, CDC7, and E2F2, were enriched in the transcriptional regulatory regions of their respective genes, and the peaks of some genes were enhanced after overexpression of C/EBPβ.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Binding Assay, Functional Assay, Sequencing, Over Expression
Figure Legend Snippet: Cell-cycle progression was promoted by C/EBPβ in LO2 cells. ( A ) The schematic diagram shows that C/EBPβ binds to CDC45L promoter regions to regulate luciferase expression. ( B ) Luciferase assays were carried out to verify the C/EBPβ binding activity at promoter regions of CDC45L gene in 293T cells and LO2 cells. ( C , D ) Lentivirus-mediated C/EBPβ knockdown with three pairs of sh-RNA (sh-a, sh-b, and sh-c) was performed to determine the expression of cell-cycle genes ( C ) and transcriptional factor E2Fs genes ( D ) by qRT-PCR assays. ( E , F ) Flow cytometry was performed to detect the proportion of cell-cycle phases after the treatment with sh-RNA (C/EBPβ) in LO2 cells ( E ), and the statistical results of proportion were depicted ( F ) by GraphPad Prism 8 software. ( G ) C/EBPβ coupled with E2F2 regulated cell-cycle gene expression in hepatic progenitor cells. C/EBPβ first bound to the regulatory region of cell-cycle-regulating transcription factor E2F2 to activate E2F2, then C/EBPβ coupled with E2F2 to promote the expression of cell-cycle genes (CDC45L, CDC25C, and PCNA) in hepatic progenitor cells. Data represent mean ± SEM with p -values indicated when significant. p < 0.05 *, p < 0.01 **, p < 0.001 ***, p < 0.0001 ****, ns, not significant. Data are the three samples per group.
Techniques Used: Luciferase, Expressing, Binding Assay, Activity Assay, Quantitative RT-PCR, Flow Cytometry, Software


